The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, rather than serving food on a plate, you might try scatter feeding. So, just uh or or feeding it in a way that the animal actually has to work for it. So, do some behavior like um one of these snuffle mats. You hide the food in there. So they have to actually spend some time looking for the food before consuming it because otherwise if you serve it in a bowl the some animals simply you know they inhale it. It takes like 30 seconds and they're done.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.