Peter Attia· MD
a hundred percent mortality everybody would die who needed a transplant everybody would die within six months without it
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
a hundred percent mortality everybody would die who needed a transplant everybody would die within six months without it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
a hundred percent mortality everybody would die who needed a transplant everybody would die within six months without it and if you got it you on average 80 of the time would live at least five years if you got beyond that would live 10 15 20 or 30 years
if you don't get a heart transplant you die within six months if you get it you can live 10 15 20 30 years