Andrew Huberman· PhD
You said about two thirds of people can be hypnotized. - Right. - Obviously a third cannot. But within the two thirds that can, there's a range, and you said 15% of people fall into this, highly hypnotizable category.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
You said about two thirds of people can be hypnotized. - Right. - Obviously a third cannot. But within the two thirds that can, there's a range, and you said 15% of people fall into this, highly hypnotizable category.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.