The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And so the guidance turned out, the guidance from the clinician turned out to be immensely valuable in allowing me to go into my own heads for bits of time, but then also to resurface and share and exchange in a way to, I'm trying really get something out of it that was useful and that I could export because of course water is wonderful, but I'm not really interested in growing my relationship to water.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.