The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the cue that we're going to likely get what we want so for instance the sign that there's a deli on the corner or that I open my phone and that there's an app that represents a restaurant that sells the particular sandwich that I like that cue as I mentioned before increases dopamine you see that like oh okay and subconsciously there's already a signal that's initiated by that dopamine that I'm on the right path
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
for instance if I were to go to my phone and order food on an app or walk down the street and see the sign for a deli that's a cue that I'm likely to relieve that drop in dopamine and get not just back to Baseline but then I'll get a peak in dopamine and indeed that's what happens