The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we think it's a Teratoma and a Teratoma is a developmental uh anomaly that you carry usually from fetal life where there's a group of different cells that gets in a place where it shouldn't during development and then grows you've probably heard about people who sometimes get like a a tooth that grows hair in their abdomen Sometimes women have these around their ovaries and they're not malignant they don't spread it's a fairly easy thing
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.