The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you think it's best for people to do their own research you know seek out reliable information right start here I mean you guys vet so much stuff very safe place for people to be like this is where I want to start and then life is you you learn by exploring and seeing what works for you it's like you start with a recipe to cook right but some people like it saltier some people like it spicier you got to see what works best for you
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.