The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Right now, the things that we have talked about that make that kind of a future easier, reprogramming, really, really effective, drugs and supplements, they're getting there, but they're not there. Which means if somebody wants to partake in this future and they're of any age right now, they actually have to put in the work. It's not just going to be handed to them in the next few years.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
If somebody wants to partake in this future and they're of any age right now, they actually have to put in the work. It's not just going to be handed to them in the next in the next few years. >> No, it's not just simple as uh take two pills and and call me in the morning kind of stuff or call me in the next decade. It is hard work.