The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Like a fractal signal will kind of have low frequency stuff will be have a lot of power, but it also has all of the different frequencies are represented, but their um how their amplitude is, this is going to get a little nerdy, is proportional to their frequency. So low frequency stuff will have higher amplitude or higher power and high frequency stuff will have lower amplitude or lower power.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.