Andrew Huberman· PhD
So I think that when you actually get in front of people and face to face, people have about 75 million more things in common than they do things that are not in common that they could argue about.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So I think that when you actually get in front of people and face to face, people have about 75 million more things in common than they do things that are not in common that they could argue about.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.