We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
what we've basically found is that creams don't move the needle on data like if you're trying to really address the crow's feet or you're trying to reduce the UV damage which you can't see with your eye it's on a machine using multi-spectral Imaging uh you really need to use the devices like lasers and other things IPL which I will show you in a minute
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what we've basically found is that creams don't move the needle on data like if you're trying to really address the crow's feet or you're trying to reduce the UV damage which you can't see with your eye it's on a machine using multi-spectral Imaging uh you really need to use devices like lasers and other things IPL