The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And the people who make it easy to get started and who master the art of getting started tend to stick with it and succeed. And the people who make it hard to get started, big up dream up a big ambitious plan in their head, you know, try to do too much at once, they set themselves up to fail.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
The people who make it easy to get started and who master the art of getting started tend to stick with it and succeed. And the people who make it hard to get started, big up dream up a big ambitious plan in their head, you know, try to do too much at once, they set themselves up to fail.