Andrew Huberman· PhD
most of it is really pretty bad — but I I tend to find myself looking at the Austin Bradford Hill criteria all the time and for folks who don't know — he was a statistician who basically proposed a set of criteria
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
most of it is really pretty bad — but I I tend to find myself looking at the Austin Bradford Hill criteria all the time and for folks who don't know — he was a statistician who basically proposed a set of criteria
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.