David Sinclair· PhD
and animals can be cloned from old adults, suggesting aging is caused by information loss
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
and animals can be cloned from old adults, suggesting aging is caused by information loss
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
our cells retain their youthful digital information even when we are old.”
i actually and my colleagues think that dna is largely intact in our bodies even when we're very old so that the genetic information is there to be young and we actually know this already because you can take a a skin cell or an utter cell and and clone it and make a new animal so that the genetic information is still there
the genome is digital information it's very easy to preserve to reason we went from analog to digital and in 2000 DNA is four letters it's digital it's easy to replicate it's easy to store you can boil it it's very robust that's what we've actually come to discover is that the genome is fairly intact in old people and old animals