The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
A good friend of mine since childhood who's a chair of neurosurgery um not at Stanford but at a nearby university uh told me that it is not uncommon for him like on a monthly basis someone will reach out saying hey I went in for a whole body MRI and discovered that I've got a tumor on my optic kayazm or I've got a small
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.