We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
The FDA will not let drugs on the market until proven safe. So, it's the exact opposite that people trying to do good things with medicines are blocked until they have incredibly high rigor of evidence to show they actually do things. Whereas in the chemical sphere, you can produce whatever you want and then it has to be proven bad over time.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.