The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
past that it's full spectrum it's either you know a fire which is is broad spectrum as we see here or it's like proper sunlight which has a swath of wavelengths so I would say we should be cautious about any very narrow band isolated light because the Sun and fire are Broadband emitters and that's what's existing in nature
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.