The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we talked about pfas a little bit forever chemicals cue the echo those are a known endocrine disruptor they're in Plastics and they're in Lululemon leggings they're probably in Nike leggings they're in they're potentially in the little you know there's running shorts that have the built-in underwear for dudes or the bathing suits that have the built-in underwear potentially in your Jiu Jitsu compression shorts all these things potentially have pfas
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so we talked about pfas a little bit forever chemicals cue the echo those are a known endocrine disruptor they're in Plastics and they're in Lululemon leggings they're probably in Nike leggings
There are forever chemicals in the crotch region of Lululemon leggings and the leggings of many other companies. These are PFAs, perfluoroalkyl compounds, that are called forever chemicals.