Bryan Johnson· Author
Caloric restriction (25%) being a primary driver, which also has the harmless side effect of facial volume loss https://t.co/GOT6wD0YzP
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Caloric restriction (25%) being a primary driver, which also has the harmless side effect of facial volume loss https://t.co/GOT6wD0YzP
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
We’ve corrected for the testosterone and in fact achieved a 20 yr equivalent age reduction for my free testosterone index (FTI).
Caloric restriction (25%) being a primary driver, which also has the harmless side effect of facial volume loss