The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But most of the abnormalities in in chromosomes that happen in a zygote are believed to be related to maternal age. And does that mean we think that the abnormality occurred way before ovulation or when do we think that that occurred? We think it occurred in the stage of meiosis that happens as the egg is developing that much that ripening phase.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.