The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
such that you can combat colds and flu meaning if you are exposed to a cold or flu that is if it breaches that physical barrier of your skin and the mucosal lining of your nose your mouth or it gets into your eyes that you stand the greatest chance of defeating that colder flu at the level of your innate immune system such that your adaptive immune system never even has to respond to it by creating all those specific antibodies
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.