The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
humans are the opposite humans can live in any ecological niche in the world from the tropics to the poles and humans eat a wide wide wide variety of foods and as a result it means that we have have to have a very plastic old factory system there have to be very few things that we find innately aversive
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there are only a handful of odors rotting meat odors uh molecules with the evocative names like cadaverine and putene are things that even babies when they're newborn find aversive