Bryan Johnson· Author
We’re in the early days in longevity research. Experimentation and criticism are both necessary.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
We’re in the early days in longevity research. Experimentation and criticism are both necessary.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
almost no anti-aging scientist agrees with another anti-aging scientist they all have their different opinions
there's probably more unknowns than there are knowns at this point
if you take five anti-aging scientists all of a top tier caliber and you make the request can you please design an anti-aging protocol for me you will get five different protocols they do not agree on almost anything