The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
You know we look at studies where kids were adopted out of families with parents who you know were addicted to alcohol. Much higher likelihood of developing an alcohol problem even if they were raised by tea toters for for example.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
early childhood development parents that model maladaptive addictive behaviors or that explicitly or implicitly condone substance use or other adictive behaviors those kids are more likely to develop Addiction in adulthood especially if there's trauma if there's uh negative attachment
whereas kids who are raised in in a home where patients are modeling healthy adaptive coping strategies where they have a good attachment to their kids where there's not sexual physical or emotional abuse those kids are um protected right or relatively protected