Andrew Huberman· PhD
you count 1 1,00 2 1,00 whatever. As long as you can count to like 5 seconds, you're probably okay. But once you're getting to that level, you should, you know, maybe go inside
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you count 1 1,00 2 1,00 whatever. As long as you can count to like 5 seconds, you're probably okay. But once you're getting to that level, you should, you know, maybe go inside
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Thunder that sounds way off in the distance. If you have an understanding of thunder and lightning predicts a lower probability of you getting hit by lightning.