Bryan Johnson· Author
The reason is that these are not changes that threated survival, hence evolutionary processes did not take care of these; similar to how aging is there since evolution does not care to optimize for longer life.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
The reason is that these are not changes that threated survival, hence evolutionary processes did not take care of these; similar to how aging is there since evolution does not care to optimize for longer life.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.