The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you like big data, you like numbers, you like statistics, you like um proteomics, genomics, RNA seek, you know, I mean, this is serious science that you're willing to look at what's out there, what people are doing, what they're willing to do, and ask what are the things to avoid, what are the things to do more of and really customizing it for people's needs.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.