David Sinclair· PhD
The other thing that we can do is capture them at a much younger state. That's where cord blood comes in.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
The other thing that we can do is capture them at a much younger state. That's where cord blood comes in.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
The thing is, cord blood is a good example because it has been used and hundreds of kids have been cured with the use of cord blood. So, yes, those stem cells that form new blood because it replaces your bone marrow have been used and have been very successful.