Andrew Huberman· PhD
So at least in the short term, activating heat shock proteins is a good thing. You don't want heat shock proteins to be activated for long periods of time, because that gets to be problematic for other reasons.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So at least in the short term, activating heat shock proteins is a good thing. You don't want heat shock proteins to be activated for long periods of time, because that gets to be problematic for other reasons.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think heat shock proteins play a role in the longevity.