The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
One of the problems, however, is that people will start taking finasteride at a low dose 0.1mg or 0.2mg, maybe even 0.01mg, and there will be a reduction in their DHT, but because of the long duration of that antigen phase, they don't see a lot of change in hair growth in the first month or even two months, and so what they end up doing is increasing their dosage and then they start to see hair growth, but then they start to experience more side effects.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.