The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Other individuals who were studied 20 years ago have not been followed longitudinally and that's hard um you know there although there have been some epidemiological studies like Framingham that have followed individuals over long periods of time it's hard to be able to do that people move people you know investigators lose funding people die I mean you know lots of things that happen
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
just knowing what someone looked like it to to and that same person at 22. there are very few studies in terms of in children what that looks like