Andrew Huberman· PhD
there is no human intervention that can extend lifespan that has been tested or validated.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there is no human intervention that can extend lifespan that has been tested or validated.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And I think we don't we haven't found a magic that would keep everything together for a longer period of time and certainly not in humans.
And so, is there any evidence that increasing NAD levels either through NMN or through NR or direct infusion or injection of NAD, any of those things can actually extend the lifespan of humans and or experimental models. >> Yeah. Yeah, I mean this is not my area of expertise but um just as a blank statement there is no human intervention that can extend lifespan