Peter Attia· MD
looking back over the past 30 years we have basically made no progress in the long-term management of metastatic epithelial cancers
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
looking back over the past 30 years we have basically made no progress in the long-term management of metastatic epithelial cancers
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
median survival for metastatic cancer has increased across the board so a person today with metastatic coloral cancer or woman today with metastic breast cancer or a person with metastatic lung cancer these people will live longer with those diseases today thanks mostly to treatments
we're in such desperate need of better treatments for patients with metastatic cancers uh because we just we can beat them back a little bit we can improve Survival by months and for some cancers maybe a few years like breast cancer and colon cancer but everybody ultimately will succumb to the disease
the half little a little less than half of patients that cannot be cured result in this enormous tragedy of 600,000 innocent people dying of cancer every year one once the cancer spreads however and this in my view is a dirty little secret of oncology and that is that if a cancer spreads from its local site and cannot be surgically removed then the death rate in that patient is 100% that is we have virtually no treatments that can cure systemic treatments that can cure a patient with a metastatic solid cancer