The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so we believe that when cerin are activated they're improving mitochondrial biogenesis um they are um um uh in increasing DNA repair so that's probably the biggest one by the way that's sort of what brings us to um um the um the NAD story um and also reducing uh sasps right so the soluble products of senescent cells so so Tamp so in other words those are all three good things right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.