Andrew Huberman· PhD
In order to say only at risk people will become psychotic from AI, what data do you need to make that statement? I think you need people to be harmed by AI to have have that basis.
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
In order to say only at risk people will become psychotic from AI, what data do you need to make that statement? I think you need people to be harmed by AI to have have that basis.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.