Andrew Huberman· PhD
It's like, 'Yeah, but you're talking about brain development in your kid, and I'm not saying your kid is dumb, but I'm saying they're maybe not as smart as they could be or as um healthy as they could be.'
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
It's like, 'Yeah, but you're talking about brain development in your kid, and I'm not saying your kid is dumb, but I'm saying they're maybe not as smart as they could be or as um healthy as they could be.'
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
We want to be really careful that this is not something your body is meant to be exposed to when we want to think about the core of how your body is meant to function.