Paul Saladino· MD
Best defense against coronavirus? Be in the 12% of the population who don’t have metabolic dysfunction.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Best defense against coronavirus? Be in the 12% of the population who don’t have metabolic dysfunction.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I guess this means we better be metabolically healthy when we are exposed.
that's what i have seen in all of my friends everyone that i've known who's had who's had a coronavirus i don't know if i've had it or not it's possible but uh i think that if you were metabolically healthy if you were thinking about your underlying metabolic health chronovirus will essentially be a pretty non-issue