The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if there was some way we could regenerate the mitochondria but instead of it being damaged because you know when you have damaged mitochondria that that creates just more oxidative stress and damages it even more so in other words we have to basically get his body into a situation where he was generating new mitochondria so we could get rid of these issues with metabolism
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.