Paul Saladino· MD
they have what's called loss of function mutations which means that they make proteins and don't point work as well let's put it as normal genes particularly in the igf-1 and growth hormone areas
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
they have what's called loss of function mutations which means that they make proteins and don't point work as well let's put it as normal genes particularly in the igf-1 and growth hormone areas
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we found clusters of mutations in the IGF receptor those were new mutations that haven't been found before but we found him in nine of our centenarians which was 2% of our centenarians and that was kind of a proof of concept for us that that clusters of mutations that are functional is what we really need to look for