The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we site stratify that is the survival curve for the Michigan males controls is compared to the survival curve for the Michigan drug treated mice and the survival curve for Texas controls to the Texas drug treated mice Etc and then what the statistical program does is it pulls the those three uh sets of results to come up with one overall statistic
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we do it with a a very standard not not esoteric statistical trick we we site stratify that is the survival curve for the Michigan males controls is compared to the survival curve for the Michigan drug treated mice and the survival curve for Texas controls to the Texas drug treated mice Etc