Peter Attia· MD
i this is why i really strongly feel that we as the field need to ultimately really do studies that prove cancer-specific survival benefits of these tests
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i this is why i really strongly feel that we as the field need to ultimately really do studies that prove cancer-specific survival benefits of these tests
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so so i think that's sort of you know how would russian develop it but we still need to prove again i think very important that these tests decrease cancer-specific death because i think ultimately we should even though they're exciting technologies and uh we're very hopeful that they will we shouldn't just give them a pass because they're high-tech and not do the right clinical science