The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
that virus SARS kov1 if you want to call it that or just SARS had a mechanism contained within it to neutralize and to suppress the secretion of interferon uh they did some searching and they looked at SARS kov 2 and sure enough mac 1 which is a a gene in SARS kov 2 is is a is a gene that is specifically I don't want to say designed but it's there to get around interferon
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.