The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the body is smart and it knows to not allocate energy to eating under normal conditions. Normal, there's nothing normal about chemo conditions, but I think you understand what I mean. that that the body's intuition to not eat is smarter than any kind of you know uh molecular uh channery to to overcome that signal and have you be hungry
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.