Peter Attia· MD
and that has led to the idea that you can create clocks that look at specific changes in chemical marks in the the dna the genome that are um telling you something about how long that that organism has been alive
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and that has led to the idea that you can create clocks that look at specific changes in chemical marks in the the dna the genome that are um telling you something about how long that that organism has been alive
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so the epigenetic clock refers to typically chemical marks on dna that regulate gene expression whether or not you know the gene that is located at specific points in your genome gets turned on or or off and what has been observed is that those marks change with age in pretty much every organism where it's been studied