The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the brain can learn to construct categories at different scales of gen generalizability so if I'm in an instance and um my brain is making a guess is it drawing from past instances that were associated with the word anger uh were associated with the word fear maybe it's some combination it's the words are just features they're just sounds there are also all sorts of other features like what was my heart doing what what kind of motor actions did I make what did I see next
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.