Paul Saladino· MD
if you can infect five times more people as you're asymptomatic with coronavirus the virus could have been spread much further than the flu in a given season
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you can infect five times more people as you're asymptomatic with coronavirus the virus could have been spread much further than the flu in a given season
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
well most people are now suggesting that the are not for coronavirus is significantly greater than that so if the flu which transmits between 1 to 1 or 1.4 person is infecting 55 million people a year in the US and again assuming this is no social distancing that's a normal life we can talk about this if coronavirus has a three to four or five times higher are not it's completely plausible that it's already moved through 200 million people in the United States right