The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
As the lungs expand, basically, it's like a balloon that you would pull apart. The pressure inside that balloon drops and the air will flow into the balloon. So we expand, put pressure on the lungs to pull it apart, that lowers the pressure in the air sacks called alveoli and air will flow in because pressure outside the body is higher than pressure inside the body when you're doing this expansion, when you're inhaling.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.