We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
the main argument you always get especially from people like electrical engineers and physicists is nonionizing radiation does not affect biology the RF EMF is yeah yeah RF electrical power they're both you know nonionizing but also you know what else is non-ionizing the entire visible and infrared Spectrum but they affect our biology uh as we just discussed for a while in in quite a significant manner
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
But for people just to to just, you know, absolutely say there's nothing here because it's not ionizing is putting your head in the sand. That's crazy.