The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
it was a very mild spotty first wave in the spring of 1918 which did not spread worldwide and was very hit-or-miss in the countries that did hit then there was a third wave in 1919 I began in February yes extended through the spring
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
those of us who spend time reading about it can picture what you're describing which are these three Peaks you've got this first little peak in the spring of of 18 and then it's if you just saw it by itself it would look devastating just based on the absolute numbers but then it is soda Wharf tin a relative sense by what comes about in September to December of that same year which I mean basically is like Everest next to Kilimanjaro and then you do have a third peak which is even bigger than the first peak probably by 3x that takes you into 2019
which I mean basically is like Everest next to Kilimanjaro and then you do have a third peak which is even bigger than the first peak probably by 3x that takes you into 2019
interestingly in terms of immune protection the first way protected against the second way but need the first nor second wave exposure protected against the third wave which started in February 1919