Andrew Huberman· PhD
Sure, they'll test it again because they're about to put dollars behind it. No one wants to put dollars behind something that they aren't absolutely sure is true, but you'd like the funnel to be narrower.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Sure, they'll test it again because they're about to put dollars behind it. No one wants to put dollars behind something that they aren't absolutely sure is true, but you'd like the funnel to be narrower.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.